You are here
Forestry Regeneration Burns Ignore Health Impacts
Ms Woodruff to move—That the House:—
(1) Understands that in March 2017 Forestry Tasmania proposed to light 230
regeneration burns in Autumn 2017, stating these burns would only occur when
weather conditions were suitable and smoke could disperse.
(2) Notes that on 29 to 30 April 2017 in communities across the State, and specifically at
New Norfolk, Judbury, Cygnet and Huonville, residents were subjected to thick
choking smoke from Forestry Tasmania burns.
(3) Further notes that air quality reporting data showed high spikes in smoke pollution in
April 2017, particularly across the New Norfolk, Huonville and Cygnet areas.
(4) Recognises massive regeneration burns are a serious health concern, as particulate
pollution is a known risk to people with respiratory and cardiac conditions, elderly
people and children.
(5) Also recognises these burns damage our reputation as a clean, green tourism
destination, and that there are other methods for Forestry Tasmania to achieve
(6) Further understands Forestry regeneration burns are again not being adequately
controlled, that these fires escaped their bounds in Judbury, and the Tasmanian Fire
Service had to be called in to control the situation while there were two other
vegetation fires around the State.
(7) Further understands Forestry regeneration burns compete with the TFS’s opportunity
to conduct fuel reduction burns.
(8) Calls on the Government to realise extremely high levels of smoke pollution and fires
escaping control are not in the interests of public health and safety, and to direct
Forestry to put these first as their business priorities. (4 May 2017)